Research prompts
Cited research, steelmanning, fact-checks, competitor teardowns and document summaries.
Research
Literature/market scan with citations
Needs browsing
Variables: topicdate
Give me a concise overview of {{topic}} as of {{date}}.
Structure: 1) What it is (3 sentences). 2) Key players/approaches with one line each. 3) What changed in the last 12 months. 4) Open debates. 5) 5 best sources to read next, with why.
Cite every factual claim with a link. If you can't browse, say so up front and mark anything that may be outdated. Give me a concise overview of {{topic}} as of {{date}}.
Structure: 1) What it is (3 sentences). 2) Key players/approaches with one line each. 3) What changed in the last 12 months. 4) Open debates. 5) 5 best sources to read next, with why.
Cite every factual claim with a link. If you can't browse, say so up front and mark anything that may be outdated.
Open & fill variables → Research
Steelman both sides
Any model
Variables: question
Topic/decision: {{question}}
Give me the strongest possible case FOR, then the strongest case AGAINST, as a thoughtful expert on each side would argue it. Then list the 3 facts that, if I found them out, would most change the answer, and how I could find each one out. Topic/decision: {{question}}
Give me the strongest possible case FOR, then the strongest case AGAINST, as a thoughtful expert on each side would argue it. Then list the 3 facts that, if I found them out, would most change the answer, and how I could find each one out.
Open & fill variables → Research
Summarise a long document for decisions
Use a long-context model
Variables: decisiondocument
Summarise the document below for someone who must make a decision about {{decision}}.
Output:
- TL;DR (3 bullets)
- Key facts and numbers (with section/page references)
- Risks, caveats and anything buried in footnotes
- What the document does NOT say that I'd need to know
- Recommended next questions
Quote exact wording for anything legally or financially important.
Document:
{{document}} Summarise the document below for someone who must make a decision about {{decision}}.
Output:
- TL;DR (3 bullets)
- Key facts and numbers (with section/page references)
- Risks, caveats and anything buried in footnotes
- What the document does NOT say that I'd need to know
- Recommended next questions
Quote exact wording for anything legally or financially important.
Document:
{{document}}
Open & fill variables → Research
Competitor teardown
Browsing helps
Variables: competitormy_product
Do a teardown of {{competitor}} for someone building {{my_product}}.
Cover: positioning (their one-line pitch), target customer, pricing and packaging, acquisition channels you can observe (SEO pages, ads, communities, integrations), product strengths, common complaints (from reviews/forums), and gaps I could exploit. Separate verified facts (with sources) from your inferences. Do a teardown of {{competitor}} for someone building {{my_product}}.
Cover: positioning (their one-line pitch), target customer, pricing and packaging, acquisition channels you can observe (SEO pages, ads, communities, integrations), product strengths, common complaints (from reviews/forums), and gaps I could exploit. Separate verified facts (with sources) from your inferences.
Open & fill variables → Research
Explain a paper in 5 levels
Any model
Variables: paper_or_concept
Explain {{paper_or_concept}} at five levels:
1. To a 12-year-old (2 sentences)
2. To a smart non-expert (1 paragraph)
3. To an undergraduate in the field
4. To a practitioner: what it changes in practice
5. To a researcher: limitations, assumptions, and what would falsify it
Flag any part you're not confident about. Explain {{paper_or_concept}} at five levels:
1. To a 12-year-old (2 sentences)
2. To a smart non-expert (1 paragraph)
3. To an undergraduate in the field
4. To a practitioner: what it changes in practice
5. To a researcher: limitations, assumptions, and what would falsify it
Flag any part you're not confident about.
Open & fill variables → Research
Fact-check this claim
Browsing strongly recommended
Variables: claim
Fact-check: "{{claim}}"
1. Break it into individually checkable statements.
2. For each: verdict (true / false / misleading / unverifiable), the best primary source, and one sentence of reasoning.
3. Overall verdict and what an accurate version of the claim would say.
Don't rely on memory for numbers or dates; if you can't verify, say unverifiable. Fact-check: "{{claim}}"
1. Break it into individually checkable statements.
2. For each: verdict (true / false / misleading / unverifiable), the best primary source, and one sentence of reasoning.
3. Overall verdict and what an accurate version of the claim would say.
Don't rely on memory for numbers or dates; if you can't verify, say unverifiable.
Open & fill variables → Research
Interview questions for customer discovery
Based on "The Mom Test" principles
Variables: problemaudience
I'm exploring the problem "{{problem}}" for {{audience}}. Write 12 customer interview questions that ask about past behaviour and specifics, not opinions or hypotheticals about my idea. Group them as: context, the problem's last occurrence, current workarounds, cost of the problem, and buying process. Add 3 questions I should NOT ask and why. I'm exploring the problem "{{problem}}" for {{audience}}. Write 12 customer interview questions that ask about past behaviour and specifics, not opinions or hypotheticals about my idea. Group them as: context, the problem's last occurrence, current workarounds, cost of the problem, and buying process. Add 3 questions I should NOT ask and why.
Open & fill variables → Get all 209 prompts + agent workflows
Every prompt as Markdown and JSON, 10 multi-step agent workflows, and 12 ready-made slash commands for Cursor and Claude Code. Instant zip download, one-time purchase.
New prompts every week
One short email with the best new prompts and agent workflows we've tested. Free; unsubscribe any time.